All Title Simple Truths Real Turkey Newsroom Ethnic Code Artsakh exodus Armenian literature: Audiobook Alpha Economics 7 portraits from the history of the Armenian people 5 portraits from the history of the Armenian people

Pashinyan no longer denies that he negotiates on an unconstitutional agreement

November 15 2024, 13:30

Budget hearings in the Armenian Parliament have long ceased to be just an analysis of economic statistics or a discussion of social and economic programs. The budget discussions are Nikol Pashinyan’s justification to bring the project of reshaping the Armenian statehood to a logical conclusion, even despite the risk of destroying this statehood after his experiments.

Discussions on the 2025 budget were no exception, and Pashinyan made a number of high-profile statements, one of which is worth considering in more detail. “If the Constitutional Court decides that the text of the peace treaty (with Azerbaijan – ed.) does not comply with the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia (although such a development is unlikely after the decision of September 26), the Republic of Armenia is likely to initiate constitutional changes. If the Constitutional Court decides that the text of the peace treaty complies with the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia, the document will undergo the ratification procedure in Parliament,” Nikol Pashinyan said in the Armenian Parliament.

If we describe what Pashinyan said as briefly as possible, it will mean that he no longer denies that he is negotiating a document that contradicts the legislation of Armenia, although the logic of the talks should be different—the peace treaty with Azerbaijan should not contain articles that contradict the basic law of the Republic of Armenia.

But why is this done? The rejection of the Constitution in favor of the document written by Ilham Aliyev is the unconditional surrender of the Republic of Armenia. This, in turn, is done in order not to comply with the November 9th document. A document that, according to the West, is “a noose around the neck” primarily of Azerbaijan, since part of its communications will be controlled by Russia. The West cannot allow this to happen. Baku needs the collective West, at least to supply “cannon fodder” for a future war against Iran (“warmest greetings” to the Iranian administration, which, through the Iranian ambassador to Armenia, stated that “Russia and Iran are not allies in the South Caucasus region”).

In the perception of Western globalist forces, the Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict pushes Baku to balance between Moscow and the West, between Moscow and Ankara. By removing the Armenian factor as such from this construction (not only the Armenian Karabakh but also Armenia and Armenians of the region as a whole), an opportunity will open for Baku’s total separation from Moscow and its further use against Tehran. It is no coincidence that, according to former Ambassador for Special Assignments Edmond Marukyan, there are Armenian politicians who believe that “Armenia should help Azerbaijan to free itself from the Russian occupation.”

In other words, for the sake of implementing globalist plans against Russia, Nikol Pashinyan is ready to start an unconditional surrender of Armenia.

Think about it…