Armenia doesn’t understand that Azerbaijan and Turkey want to wipe it off the map: MEP

Geadis Geadi, a member of the European Parliament from Cyprus, said in a conversation with Alpha News that he disagrees with the approach that effectively envisions replacing Russian influence in Armenia with Turkish influence.

“I visit Armenia regularly, and I see that today there is a prevailing desire for an absolutely neutral policy and for developing cooperation with Turkey and Azerbaijan, without understanding that these countries want to wipe Armenia off the map and completely redraw the map of the world. Since we too have been victims of Turkish policy, we can understand where such processes might lead in the future,” the MEP emphasized.

Answering a question about the “peace” being promoted with Azerbaijan, he said:
“I think this is an illusion of peace, because Turkey is a country with long-term geopolitical views. Knowing its history, I have seen what its views are on Armenia, the Middle East and the Eastern Mediterranean as a whole. And they want to wipe off the map all the countries that have caused them problems. So, from my point of view, I disagree with and do not accept Armenia’s new geopolitical vision. And I think this will lead to a lot of problems, I consider it dangerous. Pashinyan has tried to push Europe toward a certain position. He has said that if he isn’t accepted as an ally of Turkey, then it’s necessary to ‘draw Turkey into Europe.’ By his logic, Armenia must move through Turkey to get a path into the EU. So the only route is through Turkey.

On the other hand, there is the Russian path of development. In other words, in my view, he is promoting an anti-Russian version of this geopolitical line. If we’re talking about Armenia possibly being admitted to the European Union, it could be admitted to the EU without Turkey as well. Membership in Europe doesn’t mean a country necessarily has to have a land connection to it. For example, Cyprus has no such connection, yet it’s an EU member. So the claim that a territorial ‘link’ is required is not a necessary condition. At the same time, we’re also talking about Turkey, which, in my view, cannot be admitted to the EU, since it is a country that does not respect international law, human rights, or the norms of maritime law.”

Speaking about the elections in Armenia and the fact that Europe turned a blind eye to violations in the Armenian elections, following the logic of supporting a geopolitical line of confrontation with Russia in the region that is advantageous to itself, he noted that, on the whole, there is a positive view of Armenia within the European Parliament.

“Some don’t share this optimism, but most members of the European Parliament still tend to view Armenia rather positively, and they feel that some issues or changes need to be addressed in Armenia’s electoral procedures. But I want to share what I know from my visit to Armenia. I spoke with Pashinyan, I spoke with the president, I spoke with members of parliament, and I saw that there seem to be two different voices within Armenian society. One part of the Armenian people supports Pashinyan and wants to leave in the past everything that happened with Turkey and Azerbaijan, effectively trying to forget their own history. And there is another part of the Armenian people that never forgets. They are fighting for justice, for their country, their nation and their historical memory. And they make no compromises with countries that, in their view, are enemies of Armenia, especially since, in their view, these countries are not democratic.

This is exactly what I talked about at my last plenary session in Strasbourg, when I raised the issue of Armenia. I noted that I saw, as it were, two different voices, two different communities, two different approaches and two different ways of thinking within Armenian society. I have spoken with many people in Armenia itself, outside it, in Brussels, in Strasbourg, and in Cyprus, where there is a sizable Armenian community. And I came to the conclusion that there really are two different views of the situation.

But I support those people who are fighting for their justice, who are fighting for their history. And I disagree with Pashinyan’s new political outlook.

I said this in his office as well, when we had a meeting. I expressed my opinion, he disagreed, but I can say everything I believe.

And since I come from a country like Cyprus, I fully understand this pain, I fully understand that we must defend the law, we must defend justice. And my message to the Armenian people is: keep fighting, keep fighting for justice. Never forget your history.

I want to draw the Armenian people’s attention to the fact that they must never forget the Armenian Genocide. I should say that when we had an official European Parliament session at Armenia’s National Assembly, I introduced an amendment concerning recognition of the Armenian Genocide. And indeed, some members of the Armenian parliament voted against it, that’s a real fact. They were representatives of Pashinyan’s party,” the MEP noted.